Global warming a matter of faith, not fact

We have a new climate change consensus — and it's good news everyone
Climate change is now a question of adaptation. And it's not as frightening a question as you might think
4/05/2014
http://goo.gl/PdgQnK
Nigel Lawson was right after all. Ever since the Centre for Policy Studies lecture in 2006 that launched the former chancellor on his late career as a critic of global warming policy, Lord Lawson has been stressing the need to adapt to climate change, rather than throw public money at futile attempts to prevent it. Until now, the official line has been largely to ignore adaptation and focus instead on ‘mitigation’ — the misleading term for preventing carbon dioxide emissions.

Don't Fear The Doomsday Global Warming Prophecies Of The IPCC Report
4/03/2014
http://goo.gl/bkwg8v
You've been reading all week in the MSM about the doomsday predictions in the latest IPCC report.

‘Global warming’ is rubbish says top professor
4/02/2014
http://goo.gl/vdGpf4
He doesn’t believe in ‘global warming’ and says ‘climate change’ is a meaningless term used as a sop by big business to create money. Neil hudson met prof les woodcock

Another Prominent Scientist Dissents! Fmr. NASA Scientist Dr. Les Woodcock ‘Laughs’ at Global Warming – ‘Global warming is nonsense’ Top Prof. Declares
4/03/2014
http://goo.gl/Imm375

Global warming a matter of faith, not fact
4/02/2014
http://goo.gl/Rjifc7
Back in September, even the UN's official climate change propagandists, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) could no longer ignore the fact that global temperatures had not risen for close to two decades. Despite the UN's computer models forecasting temperature gains of nearly half a degree Celsius over that time, the global average temperature had stubbornly refused to budge up or down for 18 years.

Debunking every IPCC climate prophesy of war, pestilence, famine, drought, impacts in one line
4/02/2014
http://goo.gl/8DDrsm
What's the point of analyzing all the detail from the IPCC prophesies of doom in Working Group II. Everything in the Working Group II report depends entirely on Working Group I, which is based on models we know are broken!

Climate Change: The Facts 2014
The ultimate climate book — Steyn, Delingpole, Bolt, Watts, Lindzen, Carter, and Jo Nova
4/02/2014
http://goo.gl/6WhN87

Why the IPCC Report Neglects the Benefits of Global Warming 
4/01/2014
http://goo.gl/uWMWUt

IPCC's doom-and-gloom global warming apocalypse is political theater, not real science
3/31/2014

http://goo.gl/1vWuLB

Green Ideologues From UK Government Sexed Up IPCC Climate Report
3/31/2014
http://goo.gl/HSEzqa
Green ideologues working for the British government helped "sex up" the latest Intergovernmental Panel On Climate Change (IPCC) report in order to make its conclusions sound more scary than the evidence warrants, it emerged today.

Prof Richard Tol wants his name removed from “exaggerated” IPCC report
3/27/2014
http://goo.gl/Uvqopl

UK professor refuses to put his name to ‘apocalyptic’ UN climate change survey that he claims is exaggerating the effects

Judge Orders NASA to Release Climate Change-Related Documents
11/10/2013
http://goo.gl/DwPcBK

Did JUPITER kickstart life on Earth? Gas giant may have altered climate billions of years ago

Did JUPITER kickstart life on Earth? Gas giant may have altered climate billions of years ago
4/11/2014
http://goo.gl/SHiHKa

How Mighty Jupiter Could Have Changed Earth's Habitability
4/10/2014
http://goo.gl/MqI6db
 Is Jupiter a friendly planet, Earth's enemy, or perhaps both?

CFACT 不一樣的非政府組織 不一樣的氣候變化觀點

花絮：不一樣的非政府組織 不一樣的氣候變化觀點
2010年04月10日 
來源： 新華網

　　新華網德國波恩４月９日電（記者黃堃　郇公弟）新一輪聯合國氣候變化談判９日在德國波恩拉開帷幕，與以往歷次氣候變化會議一樣，會場內外都活躍著非政府組織的身影，它們形形色色的活動也顯示出不同人群對氣候變化的不同看法。

　　一個推崇素食主義的非政府組織舉行的活動顯得很溫馨。其成員戴上頭套扮成小雞、小牛、小羊等動物，一有人走過，他們就舉起大大的“愛我，別吃我”的宣傳板。

　　畜牧業是溫室氣體的一個重點排放行業。盡管“為減緩氣候變化就應該不吃肉”的觀點還有待商榷，但這些抓住氣候談判機會來宣揚素食主張的非政府組織成員卻有很好的理由：“這是每個人都能做的（應對氣候變化）簡單易行的方法，我們不需要等待各國政府的談判結果，我們自己就可以馬上行動。”

https://www.facebook.com/co2cc

　　這裏甚至還有對“減排溫室氣體以應對氣候變化”並不認同的非政府組織 CFACT Committee for a Constructive Tomorrow。其成員瓦爾特‧蒙克頓說，他們對氣候變化問題中自然因素和人為因素所佔比重的看法與當前主流觀點並不一致，但是仍讚同聯合國氣候變化談判中關于保護森林和環境的內容，因此也來宣傳自己的主張。

　　令人驚訝的是，這樣一個在氣候變化問題上“非主流”的非政府組織宣傳臺就設在氣候談判主會議廳門外，並獲得《聯合國氣候變化框架公約》秘書處的許可。這既顯示出秘書處對不同意見的大度，也從另一個側面說明聯合國協調應對氣候變化行動的不易。

（責任編輯: 安傳香 ）