Wednesday, October 19, 2016

全球暖化與氣候變遷書籍

別輕易相信!你必須知道的科學偽新聞
Don’t trust them! 10 Mistakes in the Science News that you must realize.
作者: 黃俊儒
出版日期:2014/02/17
如果有一個財團想要進軍綠色能源產業,它可不可能在媒體中刻意透過「全球暖化」概念的渲染,製造某種恐慌性的消費,以成就這個新產業?
http://bit.ly/Xbspp5

氣候變化再審視 - 非政府國際 氣候變化 研究組報告
5/01/2013
http://goo.gl/SqOy7O

維基解密:你不知道的事實真相

作者:蘇言,賀瀕
出版日:2011/10/1
http://goo.gl/nJ5KlG
第五章 「氣候門」—全球最大科學醜聞
1.全球暖化是一場魔術?
2.不方便說的真相
3.氣候戰爭,誰說了算?
4.冰封時代,未來究竟是變暖還是變冷?

呼喚理性: 全球變暖的冷思考 

~ 奈傑爾·勞森(Nigel Lawson) (作者), 戴黍 (譯者), 李振亮 (譯者)
6/01/2011
http://goo.gl/DE6kjS

郎咸平說中國即將面臨的14場經濟戰爭

14場危機牽動你我的未來,不得不正色以待……
作者:郎咸平
出版日:2010/12/15
http://bit.ly/Xbtayo
第六章 氣候大戰︰一個驚天大謊言
第七章 低碳美元大戰︰美國綁架全球經濟的碳計畫
第八章 新能源大戰︰中國的新能源經濟為誰綻放?
第十二章 基因改造大戰︰來勢洶洶的產業資本孟山都
第十三章 焦炭大戰︰中國從來就沒有焦炭定價權

YesAsia


低碳陰謀:一場大國發起假環保之名的新經濟戰爭

作者:勾紅洋
出版日期:2010年11月03日
http://bit.ly/1fQvXnK

以碳之名: 低碳騙局幕後的全球博弈

~ 柳下再會 (作者)
出版日期: 2010年4月1日
http://goo.gl/pwfkHr

氣候騙局 

作者:(法國)克洛德•阿萊格爾
譯者:孫瑛 合著者:李煜萍

2010
http://goo.gl/uPYL4X

超爆蘋果橘子經濟學 

2010/01/11
http://goo.gl/uxp3yq

全球變暖︰毫無來由的恐慌

作者:[美]S.弗雷德‧辛格 丹尼斯‧T.艾沃利
譯者:林文鵬 王臣立
出版日期:2008/04/01
http://goo.gl/JoCm10

費城實驗:究竟是科學還是科幻? 

http://goo.gl/T8EFLC
作者:江晃榮
出版社:五南
出版日期:2013/10/25
CH 1   新時代與新科學觀念的誕生
CH 2   費城實驗與蒙托克計畫相關人物
CH 3   費城實驗相關的科學技術
CH 4   費城實驗的真相
CH 5   費城實驗的後續研究──蒙托克計畫
CH 6   費城實驗原理利用的終極目標──氣象兵器與地震武器
結論 觀念的創生─觀念轉個彎,生命無限寬

Climate Change Books

地球温暖化でウソをつくメディアと政府のトリック、警察発表のトリックと、それをたれ流す新聞、テレビ [Kindle版]
武田邦彦 (著)
http://goo.gl/4PqjRL

地球環境問題や科学などのテーマで、独自の理論がTVでも話題の武田邦彦が驚愕の真実を明らかにする!本書では地球温暖化について、鋭いメスをいれる。

你的全球暖化知識正確嗎? 
(作者認同暖化是人為的)

作者:村沢 義久
譯者:陳嫺若
出版日:2010/4/22
http://goo.gl/jEsZuh

手にとるように地球温暖化がわかる本 [単行本(ソフトカバー)]

村沢 義久 (著)
1/15/2008
http://amzn.to/17Tbo29 

暖化?別鬧了!
(作者認同暖化是人為的)
Cool It: The Skeptical Environmentalist’s Guide to Global Warming
作者:隆柏格 原文作者:Bjorn Lomborg 譯者:嚴麗娟
出版日期:2008/09/01
http://goo.gl/33oyMR

Monday, August 29, 2016

陰謀論 神秘學討論群組

Hidden Truths, Cover-Ups, & Conspiracies Facebook Closed Group 55
http://goo.gl/9Y7GtV

澳門陰謀論怪異研究社
Closed Group 51
https://goo.gl/MdzOlX

新神秘學研究社 Facebook Closed Group
http://goo.gl/f5oz3Y 43
神秘學, 陰謀論, NewAge, 超自然
神秘學: 承傳了遠古時代不主流或不公開的智慧同技術而衍生出來的一套研 究學問。
陰謀論: 影子政府機密資料、陰謀和行動的一種論說。
NewAge: 創造.革新.統一同心靈為基本的一種哲學。

超自然: 超自然係超出了科學解釋的現象。

Farumradio花冧電台神秘學討論群組 Open
http://goo.gl/5X9gFW 44

花冧電台討論群組,給予各位聽眾及主持自由討論各種節目相關資訊,分享神秘學、超自然科學、宗教、New Age、身心靈、宇宙、古文明、UFO、外星人、陰謀論、世界大事。

真假陰謀 Public Group
https://goo.gl/smjuFv 41

踢爆美國西方大陰謀 Devil USA Unfold 39

https://goo.gl/FPOEu2

陰謀論&超自然 31

https://goo.gl/iPvRd0

星空奇談 - ghost889.com Closed
http://goo.gl/JJ81KI 51
加拿大中文電臺 - 多倫多靈異節目 

星空奇談 Mid-Night Mystery 

陰謀背後@staradio.com.hk Open
http://goo.gl/t17jgm 12578 Page
陰謀背後~我們處身的世界,並非肉眼所見的公平;似乎有充足選擇,實際上已經精心策劃;充滿陰謀與計劃的世界,就等你去揭露。Online Forum http://goo.gl/l4mEK0

環保及全球氣候變化 -  香港討論區
http://goo.gl/VOOmFb

UFO及超自然力量討論 -  香港討論區

http://goo.gl/1yuwRH

陰謀背後星滙網節目論壇 Star Internet Radio

http://goo.gl/YHvygO

《不能說的真相》討論區

http://goo.gl/HAxAaZ

Monday, March 14, 2016

Climate Change Facebook Discussion Groups

Climate Change Discussion Resource Open
http://goo.gl/jUsKWB 15138
For storing documentation against the claim of CAGW.

Climate Change Discussion Open

http://goo.gl/sQFSR8 14857

Promote Climate Truth!
No taxes, trades or treaties! No treachery! Open

http://goo.gl/UIY0nr  2354
We do not believe that mankind can effect the earth's climate through C02 emissions. 

Watts Up With That? WUWT Closed

http://goo.gl/Eu1E3U 2051

Climate Change - an open discussion Group Open

http://goo.gl/hqaDWB 1455 ( View? )

There is no greenhouse effect. Closed

http://goo.gl/vr3cpF
This is an open discussion group that was created on June 27th 2012 to air the failings of the greenhouse effect "theory" as presently taught. 1314

Man Made Global Warming or Looney Left   Open

http://goo.gl/RHHOcZ   97

Global warming Politics & Lies Public Group
http://goo.gl/fzj2Vf 441

The Daily Global Warming Hoax Report  Open

http://goo.gl/gTdVSb  418

Climate Change Is A Hoax! Open

http://goo.gl/Zmr1AT 323

Australian Climate Sceptics Group Open

http://goo.gl/bNtRTj 316

Skeptical Science Lies Open Group
http://goo.gl/RIi8Jb    309

Al Gore VS Brian Sussman Climate Change Debate Open

http://goo.gl/eRuyOp  244

The Climate Counsel Open Group

http://goo.gl/Wo5fb7 214
We provide Australians with a reliable source of information about the science of climate change. We counter the disinformation of the Climate Council. The hypothesis that human-caused carbon dioxide emissions are causing dangerous global warming has been falsified.

Skeptics Resource Page Closed Group

http://goo.gl/yGrTgm   224
Skeptics Database Index Page Open Group
http://goo.gl/w1wFNr   201

Scientists Skeptical of AGW Open Group

http://goo.gl/whc0f4 206

The Big Lie of Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) Open Group

http://goo.gl/KVA2L1   169

Global Warming is a HOAX ? Open Group

http://goo.gl/BVwhQc   166

Carbon Dioxide as a Resource Open Group

http://goo.gl/qWxIpU   159

Why it's not carbon dioxide after all Open Group

http://goo.gl/vLUQqa   136

Skeptics Quick Index Page Closed Group

http://goo.gl/WGtkPm 107

Online Discussion on Climate Change Closed Group

http://goo.gl/eDSxrA  63

Global Warming Hoax Open

http://goo.gl/Yji8zf   34

Global Warming Skeptics Web Forum

http://goo.gl/hJoW4H 72

Climate Change A Global Hoax

https://goo.gl/c7rW5x



Tuesday, February 9, 2016

Why Skeptics are Losing the Climate Change Battle

Why Skeptics are Losing the Climate Change Battle
By Anthony Bright-Paul 2/05/2016
American Thinker 


I am a climate skeptic. Many skeptics know that and have even contributed to my book Climate for the Layman. But we are losing the argument and for one simple reason. We keep, - or at least some of us - keep up the illusion that there is such a thing as a Global Temperature

There is no such entity and never has been. Furthermore there is no such thing as an average Global Temperature either. Peace be to Dr. Christy of the University of Alabama, for whom I have the greatest respect. He assures me that there is an average Global Temperature arrived at by inference from remote sensing from satellites. This is done by counting the number of joules, which as you all know I trust, are units of energy.

But may I humbly beg to differ. It is manifestly impossible to put in all the data in order to arrive at an average. It is clear that an average such as NASA provides based upon some 3,486 weather stations situated at 5ft above the ground is just nonsense. Why? Because in the whole of this sacred Planet of ours to determine the temperature based upon such a sparse amount is truly ridiculous. 

Moreover of the 3,486 stations 3,269 are situated in the relatively warm areas of Europe, America, and Africa. How many stations are there in the vast continent of Antarctica? Merely 8. Read that again – merely 8.

This is not an average at all. In no way is it scientific. In no way does it make clear that had the temperature been taken at 10ft above the ground the readings would have been different. The fact is these are atmospheric temperatures that are measuring the tiniest possible part of the atmosphere. 

The atmosphere that we live in has a thickness of some 66 miles or 100 kilometres not just 5 ft. So in no way is this a truly atmospheric temperature.

Within one column of air rising up 66 miles to outer space there is a huge range of temperatures. So it would make more sense to average a column. But who can average a column over the poles equally with a column over the tropics? And who can do it systematically on a grid system taking into account night and day?

The trouble is that nothing is static and yet both skeptics and warmists behave as if it were so. Any average that was taken right now would already be wrong the minute thereafter. We are hurtling through space, we are winding round the Milk Way, we are being bombarded by cosmic rays and by Solar winds and Solar storms, yet we have allowed the warmists to dominate the argument and propose that man is warming the globe by emitting too much carbon dioxide.

That argument alone is ridiculous and the skeptics know that. But they have built themselves a hole by going along with the warmist idea that there is a Global Temperature, which can be manipulated down by man, even to 2 degrees Celsius. Such an idea is also absurd, but dear skeptics, we have given it credence by acknowledging that there is some sort of mysterious Global Temperature or even an average Global Temperature. There are no such entities.

The whole of the warmist argument collapses once we declare roundly that there is no Global Temperature and neither is there such an entity as an average Global Temperature either. There is such a mass of data constantly on the move that it is impossible to infer an average. What is even more absurd is that the warmists claim that 2015 was the warmest ever and the skeptics reply that it was only the third warmest. Game, set and match to the warmists.

And as to remote sensing by satellites the data obtained may be of some scientific interest, but can counting units of energy likewise tell us the temperature of the planet? Well, the answer is no, for the very simple reason that there is not one temperature, but a huge mass of ever changing temperatures. Radiation may be energy but it is not heat, is it? Not till it encounters mass. Besides which what is being counted?  We need to be yet more skeptical.

The vast majority of employed scientists apparently support the warmist view, namely that man is warming the Planet, that that warming is dangerous, and that the warming is causing climates to change. Yet it is no surprise that the vast majority of scientists who contest these claims are retired, no longer dependent upon funding from the state. The warmist arguments are riddled with holes and can easily be shot to pieces, but only if the skeptics are truly skeptical!


Friday, January 1, 2016